History, 08.10.2019 13:30 lilswetheart2007
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historical event?
a. to hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
b. to learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
c. to see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
d. to understand how people felt during the period when the event happened
Answers
Answer from: Quest
the correct answer for the first is d
Answer from: Quest
it foreshadows the theme of the paragraph and hints the topic that will be discussed in the paragraph!
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 16:00, hfrench5130
Numbing feelings with addictive substances becomes a vicious cycle as the addiction itself often manifests further negative emotions
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source when analyzing a historica...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 30.11.2021 02:40
Biology, 30.11.2021 02:40
