subject
History, 28.01.2020 07:31 ayoismeisalex

The know-nothing party seemed to be one of contradictions: they wanted to limit the rights of immigrants, while promoting an – agenda. why would a political party argue for limiting the rights of one group, but expanding the rights of another? while they did rally against certain groups, like –, it was mainly because these groups didn’t support the same ideals for which they stood, including abolition and –. ultimately, the know-nothings actually accomplished very little in limiting the rights of immigrants. all european immigrants benefited from being –. these groups had the advantage of being able to –, while free blacks could not.

Answers

ansver
Answer from: dondre54

The Know-Nothing party wanted to promotion a NATIVIST agenda

Explanation:

In the 1850's they rallied against Roman Catholics and immigrants, believing only native born male Protestants could vote or hold office.

ansver
Answer from: Quest

hi there!

c is your answer

~courtney

ansver
Answer from: Quest

your answer is a hope this

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 20:20, lexiejax21
What potential crisis did eleanor roosevelt resolve on behalf of president roosevelt
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:30, luisafer127
In which country did miguel hidalgo led the revolution against spain?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, Niaax7803
Which of these best describes the battle of galveston on january 1, 1863? a) a draw b) a naval battle c) a victory for the union army d) the fist civil war battle in texas
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 09:00, esekvng4342
Legally, the decision to try a child (age 13 - 17) as an adult is mostly based upon which of these? a) the severity of the crime b) the influence of the family c) the number of past offenses d) the grades of the accused child
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The know-nothing party seemed to be one of contradictions: they wanted to limit the rights of immig...